Members-Only
Recent Talks & Demos are for members only
You must be an AI Tinkerers active member to view these talks and demos.
November 20, 2024
·
Palo Alto
How we dealt with ambient agent system concurrency issues at Revo.pm
Learn how Revo.pm prevents LLM context corruption in concurrent events using locks, context‑preserving state machines, and chain‑of‑thought management to reduce token waste and improve reliability.
Overview
Managing Concurrency in LLM-powered Ambient Agents
Introduction
- Brief intro to
Revo.pm: “We’re building an ambient AI Copilot powered by LLMs”
- Core challenge: “LLMs need uninterrupted context to maintain coherent reasoning, but our agent handles multiple concurrent events”
The Problem: LLM Context Management
Real-world Example
- “Let me show you how LLM context gets corrupted…”
- Demo scenario: Website monitoring + reminder conflict
- Highlight the LLM-specific failures:
- Context window pollution from parallel requests
- Chain-of-thought reasoning breaks
- Token waste from repeated prompting
- Example prompt corruption:
Initial prompt: "Monitor website hourly..." Corrupted context: [Previous reminder data mixed in] Result: LLM loses track of original task
Our Solution: LLM-aware Concurrency
1. Intelligent Lock System with Context Preservation
# Show the lock acquisition with LLM context management
Log.Information("acquiring lock for {@llmContext}", ctxLogObject);
await using var @lock = await context.AcquireLock(copilot, cancellationToken);
// Preserve LLM conversation history and embeddings
await context.PreserveLLMState(copilot.CurrentConversation);
- Key point: “Maintains clean LLM context for each interaction”
2. LLM-aware State Machine
public interface IRevoStateMachine<TState> {
// State transitions consider LLM context
Task<TState> Reduce(State currentState, RevoChainOfThought chainOfThought);
// Handle different types of LLM interactions
Task<TState> Reduce(State currentState, LLMResponse response);
Task<TState> Reduce(State currentState, UserMessage message);
}
- Demo: Show how state transitions preserve LLM reasoning
3. Chain of Thought Management
public interface IRevoChainOfThoughtProvider {
// Manages LLM reasoning across events
Task<RevoChainOfThought> GetChainOfThought(
IRevoState state,
LLMContext context,
CancellationToken cancellationToken = default
);
}
- Demo the LLM reasoning flow:
- Context window management
- Embedding preservation
- Multi-step reasoning across events
Results & LLM Performance Monitoring
- Show monitoring dashboard with LLM metrics:
- Token usage optimization:
- Before: 2.3M tokens/day wasted on context reloading
- After: 850K tokens/day saved
- Reasoning consistency:
- 97% reduction in context-related reasoning failures
- 99.9% task completion rate
- Response latency:
- 300ms average lock acquisition
- No impact on LLM response time
- Cost implications:
- 40% reduction in token costs
- Eliminated duplicate LLM calls
- Token usage optimization:
Wrap-up & Questions
- Core benefits for LLM systems:
- Preserved reasoning chains
- Optimized token usage
- Reliable concurrent operations
- Technical innovations:
- LLM-aware state management
- Context preservation system
- Efficient token utilization
Speaker Notes
- Focus on LLM-specific challenges and solutions
- Show real monitoring data when discussing metrics
- Prepare for questions about:
- LLM context window management
- Token optimization strategies
- Scaling with multiple LLM providers
- Handling different types of LLM models
- Cost optimization techniques
- Have specific examples ready for:
- Before/after prompts
- Token usage graphs
- Reasoning chain preservation
Links
Revo: Context-aware AI agent autonomously executes product workflows across integrated tools.
Static HTML fallback page confirms X.com requires client-side JavaScript rendering.
Tech stack
Finding related talks...
Compose Email
Sending...
Email preview
Loading recent emails...